Everything from the section, arranged for lookup: the definitions, the named theorems, the standard maps, the contour recipes, and the notation. Use it as a reference rather than reading straight through.
The plane modulus and argument Analytic functions Cauchy–Riemann Contour integrals Cauchy's theorem Series Taylor and Laurent Residues real integrals, solved
That single condition forces infinite differentiability, rigidity, and a working integral calculus
Numbers and the plane
z = x + iy “a complex number” plotted at the point (x, y)
z̄ “the conjugate” reflection across the real axis; its presence blocks analyticity
|z| “the modulus” √(x² + y²); multiplicative, not additive
Arg z “the principal argument” the value in (−π, π]; the capital letter matters
r e^(iθ) “exponential form” makes powers and roots trivial
ℂ̂ “the extended plane” ℂ ∪ {∞}, the Riemann sphere
Functions and derivatives
f = u + iv “real and imaginary parts” both functions of x and y
uₓ = v_y, u_y = −vₓ “the Cauchy–Riemann equations” necessary always; sufficient with continuous partials
∂f/∂z̄ = 0 “f does not depend on z̄” the compact form of the same condition
analytic / holomorphic “differentiable on an open set” the two words are interchangeable
entire “analytic on all of ℂ” polynomials, e^z, sin z, cos z
meromorphic “analytic except for isolated poles” rational functions are the model
Integration and series
∮_C “integral around a closed contour” counterclockwise is positive
n(C, z₀) “the winding number” (1/2πi)∮ dz/(z − z₀); always an integer
cₙ “a Laurent coefficient” (1/2πi)∮ f/(z − z₀)ⁿ⁺¹ dz, with n allowed negative
Res f “the residue” the coefficient c₋₁; the only one that survives integration
principal part “the negative-power terms” empty, finite, or infinite classifies the singularity
R “radius of convergence” the distance to the nearest singularity
Arithmetic in polar form is the working skill:
z 1 z 2 = r 1 r 2 e i ( θ 1 + θ 2 ) , z n = r n e i n θ z_1z_2 = r_1r_2e^{i(\theta_1+\theta_2)}, \qquad z^n = r^ne^{in\theta} z 1 z 2 = r 1 r 2 e i ( θ 1 + θ 2 ) , z n = r n e in θ
Multiply the moduli, add the arguments. Multiplication by i i i is a quarter turn.
∣ z 1 z 2 ∣ = ∣ z 1 ∣ ∣ z 2 ∣ |z_1z_2| = |z_1||z_2| ∣ z 1 z 2 ∣ = ∣ z 1 ∣∣ z 2 ∣ , but ∣ z 1 + z 2 ∣ |z_1+z_2| ∣ z 1 + z 2 ∣ has no formula, only the triangle inequality.
z z ˉ = ∣ z ∣ 2 z\bar z = |z|^2 z z ˉ = ∣ z ∣ 2 , which is how division is done.
z n = w z^n = w z n = w has exactly n n n solutions, forming a regular n n n -gon.
The n n n th roots of unity sum to 0 and form a cyclic group of order n n n .
Set descriptions: ∣ z − a ∣ = r |z-a|=r ∣ z − a ∣ = r is a circle, ∣ z − a ∣ < r |z-a|<r ∣ z − a ∣ < r a disc, r 1 < ∣ z − a ∣ < r 2 r_1<|z-a|<r_2 r 1 < ∣ z − a ∣ < r 2 an annulus, α < Arg z < β \alpha<\operatorname{Arg}z<\beta α < Arg z < β a sector.
Complex differentiability requires the difference quotient’s limit to be the same from every direction. That forces the Cauchy–Riemann equations, and geometrically it forces the map to be locally a rotation and a uniform scaling.
Fails everywhere: z ˉ \bar z z ˉ , ∣ z ∣ |z| ∣ z ∣ , Re z \operatorname{Re}z Re z , Im z \operatorname{Im}z Im z . Fails except at one point, hence analytic nowhere: ∣ z ∣ 2 |z|^2 ∣ z ∣ 2 .
Analytic means differentiable on an open set , not at a point. Everything below needs the open set.
Infinite differentiability, and each derivative analytic
Equality with the Taylor series on any disc in the domain
The identity theorem: agreement on a set with a limit point forces global agreement
The maximum modulus principle: no interior maximum of ∣ f ∣ |f| ∣ f ∣
Liouville: bounded plus entire implies constant
Open mapping, and conformality where f ′ ≠ 0 f'\ne0 f ′ = 0
u u u and v v v harmonic, with orthogonal level curves
e z = e x ( cos y + i sin y ) , e z + 2 π i = e z , e z ≠ 0 e^z = e^x(\cos y+i\sin y), \qquad e^{z+2\pi i}=e^z, \qquad e^z \ne 0 e z = e x ( cos y + i sin y ) , e z + 2 π i = e z , e z = 0
Periodicity is the source of everything awkward. It makes log \log log multi-valued:
log z = ln ∣ z ∣ + i ( Arg z + 2 π k ) , Log ( − 1 ) = i π \log z = \ln|z|+i(\operatorname{Arg}z+2\pi k), \qquad \operatorname{Log}(-1)=i\pi log z = ln ∣ z ∣ + i ( Arg z + 2 π k ) , Log ( − 1 ) = iπ
which needs a branch cut , conventionally the negative real axis. Log ( z 1 z 2 ) = Log z 1 + Log z 2 \operatorname{Log}(z_1z_2) = \operatorname{Log}z_1+\operatorname{Log}z_2 Log ( z 1 z 2 ) = Log z 1 + Log z 2 can fail by 2 π i 2\pi i 2 π i .
sin z \sin z sin z and cos z \cos z cos z are entire and unbounded , since sin ( i y ) = i sinh y \sin(iy)=i\sinh y sin ( i y ) = i sinh y ; Liouville requires it. Their zeros stay real. Powers z a = e a log z z^a = e^{a\log z} z a = e a l o g z give one value for integer a a a , q q q values for a = p / q a=p/q a = p / q , and infinitely many otherwise; i i = e − π / 2 − 2 π k i^i = e^{-\pi/2-2\pi k} i i = e − π /2 − 2 π k is always real.
∫ γ f d z = ∫ a b f ( γ ( t ) ) γ ′ ( t ) d t \int_\gamma f\,dz = \int_a^b f(\gamma(t))\gamma'(t)\,dt ∫ γ f d z = ∫ a b f ( γ ( t )) γ ′ ( t ) d t
The one computation to memorize:
∮ ∣ z ∣ = 1 d z z = 2 π i , ∮ ∣ z ∣ = 1 z n d z = 0 ( n ≠ − 1 ) \oint_{|z|=1}\frac{dz}{z} = 2\pi i, \qquad \oint_{|z|=1}z^n\,dz = 0 \ (n\ne-1) ∮ ∣ z ∣ = 1 z d z = 2 π i , ∮ ∣ z ∣ = 1 z n d z = 0 ( n = − 1 )
The exponent − 1 -1 − 1 being the sole exception is why residues exist.
ML inequality: ∣ ∫ γ f ∣ ≤ M L \left|\int_\gamma f\right|\le ML ∫ γ f ≤ M L . Used to kill large arcs.
Theorem Statement Cauchy’s theorem f f f analytic on a simply connected domain ⇒ ∮ C f = 0 \Rightarrow \oint_C f = 0 ⇒ ∮ C f = 0 Deformation Reshaping a contour changes nothing unless it crosses a singularity Multiply connected An outer contour equals the sum of contours around the holes Integral formula f ( z 0 ) = 1 2 π i ∮ C f ( z ) z − z 0 d z f(z_0) = \frac{1}{2\pi i}\oint_C\frac{f(z)}{z-z_0}dz f ( z 0 ) = 2 π i 1 ∮ C z − z 0 f ( z ) d z Derivative formula f ( n ) ( z 0 ) = n ! 2 π i ∮ C f ( z ) ( z − z 0 ) n + 1 d z f^{(n)}(z_0) = \frac{n!}{2\pi i}\oint_C\frac{f(z)}{(z-z_0)^{n+1}}dz f ( n ) ( z 0 ) = 2 π i n ! ∮ C ( z − z 0 ) n + 1 f ( z ) d z Mean value property f ( z 0 ) f(z_0) f ( z 0 ) is the average of f f f over any circle about itMorera Vanishing closed integrals plus continuity implies analytic
Cauchy’s theorem is the Cauchy–Riemann equations integrated, via Green’s theorem. The integral formula is where infinite differentiability comes from, and it gives Liouville, then the fundamental theorem of algebra, in a few lines each.
Taylor. Analytic on a disc means equal to the Taylor series there. Over C \mathbb{C} C , analytic and locally a power series coincide, unlike over R \mathbb{R} R .
R = distance from the centre to the nearest singularity R = \text{distance from the centre to the nearest singularity} R = distance from the centre to the nearest singularity
Laurent. On an annulus r < ∣ z − z 0 ∣ < R r<|z-z_0|<R r < ∣ z − z 0 ∣ < R ,
f ( z ) = ∑ n = − ∞ ∞ c n ( z − z 0 ) n f(z) = \sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty}c_n(z-z_0)^n f ( z ) = n = − ∞ ∑ ∞ c n ( z − z 0 ) n
unique for that annulus. One function can have several Laurent series about the same centre, one per annulus of analyticity. Compute them with partial fractions plus geometric series, deciding which factor to pull out by which ratio has modulus below 1.
The consequence that matters:
∮ C f d z = 2 π i c − 1 \oint_C f\,dz = 2\pi i\,c_{-1} ∮ C f d z = 2 π i c − 1
Type Limit behaviour Principal part Removable lim f \lim f lim f exists (boundedness suffices)empty Pole of order m m m ∣ f ∣ → ∞ \lvert f\rvert\to\infty ∣ f ∣ → ∞ m m m termsEssential no limit at all infinite
For f = p / q f=p/q f = p / q with zero orders a a a and b b b : removable if a ≥ b a\ge b a ≥ b , pole of order b − a b-a b − a if a < b a<b a < b . Cancel before classifying.
Near an essential singularity, Casorati–Weierstrass gives a dense image and Picard gives every value infinitely often with at most one exception.
Residue formulas:
simple: lim z → z 0 ( z − z 0 ) f ( z ) , p ( z 0 ) q ′ ( z 0 ) \text{simple: } \lim_{z\to z_0}(z-z_0)f(z), \qquad \frac{p(z_0)}{q'(z_0)} simple: z → z 0 lim ( z − z 0 ) f ( z ) , q ′ ( z 0 ) p ( z 0 )
order m : 1 ( m − 1 ) ! lim z → z 0 d m − 1 d z m − 1 [ ( z − z 0 ) m f ( z ) ] \text{order } m: \ \frac{1}{(m-1)!}\lim_{z\to z_0}\frac{d^{m-1}}{dz^{m-1}}\big[(z-z_0)^mf(z)\big] order m : ( m − 1 )! 1 z → z 0 lim d z m − 1 d m − 1 [ ( z − z 0 ) m f ( z ) ]
Essential singularities have no formula; expand the series.
Residue theorem: ∮ C f = 2 π i ∑ Res \oint_C f = 2\pi i\sum\operatorname{Res} ∮ C f = 2 π i ∑ Res over enclosed singularities only.
Integral Contour Extra tool ∫ − ∞ ∞ p q \int_{-\infty}^\infty \frac{p}{q} ∫ − ∞ ∞ q p , deg q ≥ deg p + 2 \deg q\ge\deg p+2 deg q ≥ deg p + 2 upper semicircle ML on the arc ∫ − ∞ ∞ f ( x ) e i a x d x \int_{-\infty}^\infty f(x)e^{iax}dx ∫ − ∞ ∞ f ( x ) e ia x d x , a > 0 a>0 a > 0 upper semicircle Jordan’s lemma ∫ 0 2 π R ( cos θ , sin θ ) d θ \int_0^{2\pi}R(\cos\theta,\sin\theta)d\theta ∫ 0 2 π R ( cos θ , sin θ ) d θ unit circle, z = e i θ z=e^{i\theta} z = e i θ d θ = d z / ( i z ) d\theta = dz/(iz) d θ = d z / ( i z ) ∫ 0 ∞ \int_0^\infty ∫ 0 ∞ with x n x^n x n symmetrysector of angle 2 π / n 2\pi/n 2 π / n match the symmetry ∫ 0 ∞ x a − 1 f ( x ) d x \int_0^\infty x^{a-1}f(x)dx ∫ 0 ∞ x a − 1 f ( x ) d x keyhole the branch jump pole on the real axis indented contour half-loop gives π i Res \pi i\operatorname{Res} π i Res
Reference values: ∫ d x 1 + x 2 = π \int\frac{dx}{1+x^2}=\pi ∫ 1 + x 2 d x = π , ∫ d x 1 + x 4 = π 2 \int\frac{dx}{1+x^4}=\frac{\pi}{\sqrt2} ∫ 1 + x 4 d x = 2 π , ∫ cos x 1 + x 2 d x = π e \int\frac{\cos x}{1+x^2}dx=\frac{\pi}{e} ∫ 1 + x 2 c o s x d x = e π , ∫ 0 ∞ sin x x d x = π 2 \int_0^\infty\frac{\sin x}{x}dx=\frac{\pi}{2} ∫ 0 ∞ x s i n x d x = 2 π .
Conformal means angle-preserving, and an analytic f f f is conformal exactly where f ′ ≠ 0 f'\ne0 f ′ = 0 . At a zero of order m m m in f ′ f' f ′ , angles are multiplied by m + 1 m+1 m + 1 .
Möbius maps a z + b c z + d \frac{az+b}{cz+d} cz + d a z + b with a d − b c ≠ 0 ad-bc\ne0 a d − b c = 0 are bijections of C ^ \hat{\mathbb{C}} C ^ , form a group, send circles and lines to circles and lines, and are determined by three points.
Map Effect a z + b az+b a z + b similarity 1 / z 1/z 1/ z inversion z − i z + i \frac{z-i}{z+i} z + i z − i upper half plane → \to → disc z 2 z^2 z 2 quarter plane → \to → half plane e z e^z e z strip of height π \pi π → \to → half plane z + 1 z z+\frac1z z + z 1 circle → \to → segment (Joukowski)
Riemann mapping theorem: every simply connected domain other than C \mathbb{C} C maps conformally onto the disc. Existence only, no formula.
Argument principle: 1 2 π i ∮ f ′ f = Z − P \frac{1}{2\pi i}\oint\frac{f'}{f} = Z-P 2 π i 1 ∮ f f ′ = Z − P , equal to the winding number of the image around 0.
Rouché: ∣ g ∣ < ∣ f ∣ |g|<|f| ∣ g ∣ < ∣ f ∣ on C C C implies f f f and f + g f+g f + g have the same zero count inside. Gives the fundamental theorem of algebra with the exact count.
∇ 2 u = 0 \nabla^2u=0 ∇ 2 u = 0 . The real and imaginary parts of an analytic function are harmonic, and on a simply connected domain every harmonic function has a harmonic conjugate, unique up to a constant. On an annulus ln ∣ z ∣ \ln|z| ln ∣ z ∣ shows the conjugate can fail to exist globally.
Inherited properties: mean value, maximum principle, uniqueness from boundary data, infinite smoothness, Liouville.
The Dirichlet problem is solved on the disc by the Poisson integral formula and elsewhere by conformal mapping. Level curves of u u u and v v v are the equipotentials and field lines, or isotherms and heat flow, or velocity potential and streamlines.
Theorem Statement Cauchy–Riemann u x = v y u_x=v_y u x = v y and u y = − v x u_y=-v_x u y = − v x characterize differentiabilityCauchy’s theorem ∮ C f = 0 \oint_C f = 0 ∮ C f = 0 on a simply connected domainCauchy’s integral formula Boundary values determine interior values Morera Converse of Cauchy’s theorem Liouville Bounded plus entire implies constant Fundamental theorem of algebra Every non-constant polynomial has a root Maximum modulus No interior maximum of ∣ f ∣ \lvert f\rvert ∣ f ∣ Identity theorem Agreement on a set with a limit point forces global agreement Taylor Analytic on a disc means equal to the power series Laurent Analytic on an annulus means a two-sided series Riemann (removable) Bounded near a singularity implies removable Casorati–Weierstrass Dense image near an essential singularity Picard Every value, infinitely often, at most one exception Residue theorem ∮ C f = 2 π i ∑ Res \oint_C f = 2\pi i\sum\operatorname{Res} ∮ C f = 2 π i ∑ Res Argument principle 1 2 π i ∮ f ′ f = Z − P \frac{1}{2\pi i}\oint\frac{f'}{f}=Z-P 2 π i 1 ∮ f f ′ = Z − P Rouché ∣ g ∣ < ∣ f ∣ \lvert g\rvert<\lvert f\rvert ∣ g ∣ < ∣ f ∣ preserves the zero countRiemann mapping Simply connected, not C \mathbb{C} C , maps onto the disc Jordan’s lemma Oscillatory arcs vanish with only f → 0 f\to0 f → 0
Forgetting simple connectivity in Cauchy’s theorem. ∮ d z z = 2 π i \oint\frac{dz}{z}=2\pi i ∮ z d z = 2 π i is the standing counterexample.
Confusing arg \arg arg with Arg \operatorname{Arg} Arg , or ignoring the quadrant when computing an argument.
Applying Log ( z 1 z 2 ) = Log z 1 + Log z 2 \operatorname{Log}(z_1z_2)=\operatorname{Log}z_1+\operatorname{Log}z_2 Log ( z 1 z 2 ) = Log z 1 + Log z 2 to principal values.
Assuming ∣ sin z ∣ ≤ 1 \lvert\sin z\rvert\le1 ∣ sin z ∣ ≤ 1 . True on R \mathbb{R} R only.
Saying “differentiable at a point” when analyticity is needed. ∣ z ∣ 2 \lvert z\rvert^2 ∣ z ∣ 2 is the reminder.
Not cancelling before classifying a singularity. sin z z 3 \frac{\sin z}{z^3} z 3 s i n z has a pole of order 2, not 3.
Assuming residue and order are linked. A high-order pole can have residue 0.
Including residues of poles outside the contour.
Reading a Laurent series as belonging to a function alone. It belongs to a function and an annulus.
Forgetting to check the arc vanishes before equating a real integral with 2 π i ∑ Res 2\pi i\sum\operatorname{Res} 2 π i ∑ Res .
Using a conformal map through a critical point , where f ′ = 0 f'=0 f ′ = 0 and angles are not preserved.
Expecting a harmonic conjugate on a region with a hole.
You’ve Got This
Look at what this section actually rested on: one condition, that the derivative exists as a complex limit. From it came infinite differentiability, power series, rigidity, a working integral calculus, and a method for real integrals that no real-variable technique reaches. Almost every question in the section is answered by locating singularities and asking which the contour encloses, so if you have that reflex you have the subject. And you now know why 1 1 + x 2 \frac{1}{1+x^2} 1 + x 2 1 has a Taylor radius of 1, why sine is bounded only on the real line, and why the primes need contour integration - three things that looked like unrelated curiosities and turned out to be the same idea.
What makes complex differentiability much stronger than real differentiability? A. It requires boundedness B. The limit must agree along every direction of approach in the plane C. It requires the function to be entire D. It only applies to polynomials
What is (1 + i)^8 in polar form?
Where is f(z) = |z|² differentiable, and where is it analytic? A. Differentiable and analytic everywhere B. Differentiable only at 0, and analytic nowhere C. Analytic everywhere but not differentiable D. Neither anywhere
What is Log(−i)? A. iπ/2 B. −iπ/2 C. iπ D. Undefined
Why is ∮_{|z|=1} dz/z equal to 2πi rather than 0? A. Because 1/z is not analytic on the contour B. Because the punctured plane is not simply connected, so 1/z has no single-valued antiderivative there C. Because the contour is not smooth D. Because the modulus is 1
What is ∮_{|z|=2} e^z/(z − 1) dz?
Why does e^z fail to be injective on ℂ? A. Because it has a zero B. Because it is periodic with period 2πi C. Because it is unbounded D. It is injective
What is the radius of convergence of the Taylor series of 1/(z² + 9) about 0?
How many Laurent series does 1/((z − 1)(z − 3)) have about 0? A. One B. Two C. Three, one for each annulus of analyticity D. Infinitely many
What kind of singularity does sin z / z⁴ have at 0? A. Removable B. Pole of order 3 C. Pole of order 4 D. Essential
What is the residue of 1/(z² + 1) at z = i?
What is ∫_{−∞}^{∞} dx/(1 + x⁴)?
What does Jordan's lemma add to the ML inequality? A. It bounds the residue B. For integrands with a factor e^(iaz), a > 0, only f → 0 is needed for the upper arc to vanish C. It computes the integral exactly D. It applies only to polynomials
Where is an analytic function conformal? A. Everywhere it is defined B. Exactly where f′ ≠ 0 C. Only on the unit disc D. Only where f is injective
What is the key property of Möbius transformations? A. They preserve area B. They map circles and lines to circles and lines, and three points determine one uniquely C. They fix the origin D. They are their own inverses
How many zeros does z⁵ + 3z + 1 have in |z| < 1?
What does the argument principle count? A. The number of critical points B. Z − P inside the contour, equal to the winding number of the image around the origin C. The residue sum D. The length of the image curve
Which function is harmonic? A. x² + y² B. x² − y² C. |z| D. e^(x²)
For a continuous-time system, what does a pole at s = −2 + 3i produce? A. Growth at 2 per second B. A damped oscillation decaying like e^(−2t) and ringing at 3 rad/s C. A pure constant D. Instability
Why can a bounded entire function only be constant? A. Because entire functions are polynomials B. By Liouville's theorem, proved from the derivative formula by letting the circle's radius grow C. Because |f| has no interior maximum D. It can be non-constant
Retry Quiz Retrying will remove your ✅ checkmark until you pass again.