Skip to content

Real Analysis Review

Everything from the section, arranged for lookup rather than for reading straight through: the definitions, the named theorems, the counterexamples that force the definitions to be what they are, and the notation.

The one axiom separating R\mathbb{R} from Q\mathbb{Q}:

Every nonempty set of reals that is bounded above has a least upper bound.

Q\mathbb{Q} fails it: {xQ:x2<2}\{x \in \mathbb{Q} : x^2 < 2\} is bounded above with no rational supremum. Every existence theorem in the section traces back to this axiom.

The ε\varepsilon-characterization, which is how supremum is used in practice: s=supSs = \sup S iff ss is an upper bound and for every ε>0\varepsilon>0 there is xSx \in S with x>sεx > s - \varepsilon.

Consequences: the Archimedean property, density of Q\mathbb{Q} and of the irrationals, the nested interval property, and the existence of 2\sqrt{2}.

NameStatement
Monotone convergenceA bounded monotone sequence converges
Bolzano–WeierstrassEvery bounded sequence has a convergent subsequence
Heine–BorelA subset of R\mathbb{R} is compact iff it is closed and bounded

These are three faces of completeness, and each is used to build a point out of nothing but bounds.

anLa_n \to L means: for every ε>0\varepsilon>0 there is NN with anL<ε|a_n - L|<\varepsilon for all nNn\ge N. Written in that order, NN depends on ε\varepsilon only.

  • Limits are unique.
  • Convergent sequences are bounded; bounded sequences need not converge.
  • Limit laws hold for sums, products, quotients with nonzero limit.
  • Squeeze theorem: anbncna_n \le b_n \le c_n with an,cnLa_n, c_n \to L forces bnLb_n \to L.

A monotone bounded sequence converges, to the sup or inf of its range. This needs no candidate limit, which is why it is the first tool to reach for.

A sequence is Cauchy if its terms eventually cluster together: for every ε\varepsilon there is NN with anam<ε|a_n - a_m|<\varepsilon for all n,mNn,m\ge N.

Cauchy    convergent(in R)\text{Cauchy} \iff \text{convergent} \quad \text{(in } \mathbb{R}\text{)}

The forward direction is easy; the converse is completeness in yet another form. In Q\mathbb{Q} it fails, which is exactly what ”Q\mathbb{Q} has holes” means.

Not sufficient: consecutive terms getting close. an=na_n = \sqrt{n} has an+1an0a_{n+1}-a_n \to 0 and diverges. The Cauchy condition must hold for all pairs beyond NN, not just neighbours.

  • If anLa_n \to L then every subsequence converges to LL.
  • Two subsequences with different limits proves divergence - the cleanest divergence proof there is.
  • lim sup\limsup and lim inf\liminf are the largest and smallest subsequential limits, and always exist.

an\sum a_n converges when the partial sums do. That is the definition; everything else is a test.

  • nth-term test. an0a_n \to 0 is necessary, never sufficient.
  • Geometric. rn\sum r^n converges iff r<1|r|<1.
  • pp-series. 1/np\sum 1/n^p converges iff p>1p>1. The harmonic series p=1p=1 diverges.
  • Comparison, ratio, root, integral tests for positive series.
  • Alternating series test for decreasing terms with an0a_n\to0.

Absolute versus conditional. Absolute convergence implies convergence. A conditionally convergent series such as (1)n+1/n\sum(-1)^{n+1}/n can be rearranged to sum to anything, which is Riemann’s rearrangement theorem, while an absolutely convergent series is rearrangement-proof.

  • Open: every point has a neighbourhood inside the set. Closed: the complement is open, equivalently the set contains all its limit points.
  • \varnothing and R\mathbb{R} are both open and closed. [0,1)[0,1) is neither. “Not open” does not mean closed.
  • Arbitrary unions of open sets are open; only finite intersections are. Dually for closed sets, and (1/n,1/n)={0}\bigcap(-1/n,1/n)=\{0\} shows why the finiteness matters.
  • Compact means every open cover has a finite subcover, and by Heine–Borel that is the same as closed and bounded.
  • Compactness is what makes [a,b][a,b] special: (0,1](0,1] and [0,)[0,\infty) each fail one condition, and each breaks a theorem.
limxcf(x)=L:ε>0 δ>0: 0<xc<δ    f(x)L<ε\lim_{x\to c}f(x)=L: \quad \forall\varepsilon>0\ \exists\delta>0:\ 0<|x-c|<\delta \implies |f(x)-L|<\varepsilon

The value f(c)f(c) plays no part, and cc need not be in the domain.

ff is continuous at cc iff cc is in the domain and limxcf(x)=f(c)\lim_{x\to c}f(x)=f(c). Equivalently, every sequence xncx_n\to c has f(xn)f(c)f(x_n)\to f(c) - the sequential criterion, which is the fastest way to prove discontinuity.

For ff continuous on [a,b][a,b]:

TheoremConclusion
Boundednessff is bounded
Extreme valueff attains a maximum and a minimum
Intermediate valueff takes every value between f(a)f(a) and f(b)f(b)
Uniform continuityff is uniformly continuous

All four need both closed and bounded. f(x)=1/xf(x)=1/x on (0,1](0,1] is unbounded; f(x)=xf(x)=x on [0,)[0,\infty) attains no maximum; sin(1/x)\sin(1/x) on (0,1](0,1] is continuous and not uniformly continuous.

Uniform continuity moves the quantifier: one δ\delta for the whole domain rather than one per point. Lipschitz implies uniformly continuous implies continuous, and both implications are strict - x\sqrt{x} on [0,1][0,1] is uniformly continuous and not Lipschitz.

f(c)=limh0f(c+h)f(c)hf'(c)=\lim_{h\to0}\frac{f(c+h)-f(c)}{h}

Differentiable implies continuous; the converse fails at every point for x|x| at 0, and Weierstrass built a function continuous everywhere and differentiable nowhere.

Interior extremum theorem: an interior extremum of a differentiable function has f=0f'=0. That plus EVT gives Rolle, and Rolle after subtracting the secant gives the mean value theorem.

MVT consequences, all used freely in calculus and proved only here:

  • f=0f'=0 on an interval     f\implies f constant. This is what makes “+C” a theorem.
  • f>0    ff'>0 \implies f strictly increasing.
  • fK    f|f'|\le K \implies f is Lipschitz with constant KK.

Taylor’s theorem is Rolle applied n+1n+1 times:

f(x)=Pn(x)+f(n+1)(ξ)(n+1)!(xa)n+1f(x)=P_n(x)+\frac{f^{(n+1)}(\xi)}{(n+1)!}(x-a)^{n+1}

an equality with only ξ\xi unspecified. It gives the usable bound RnK(n+1)!xan+1|R_n| \le \frac{K}{(n+1)!}|x-a|^{n+1}.

Smooth is not analytic. e1/x2e^{-1/x^2} has every derivative zero at 0, so its Taylor series converges everywhere to the wrong function. The series converging and the series converging to ff are different claims, and the second is exactly Rn0R_n \to 0.

For bounded ff, partitions give L(f,P)=miΔxiL(f,P)=\sum m_i\Delta x_i and U(f,P)=MiΔxiU(f,P)=\sum M_i\Delta x_i. Refining raises LL and lowers UU, and every lower sum is below every upper sum.

Integrable means supPL=infPU\sup_P L = \inf_P U. Equivalently (Riemann criterion), for each ε\varepsilon some PP has U(f,P)L(f,P)<εU(f,P)-L(f,P)<\varepsilon.

  • Continuous     \implies integrable, via uniform continuity on the compact interval.
  • Monotone     \implies integrable, even with countably many jumps.
  • The Dirichlet function (1 on rationals, 0 on irrationals) is bounded and not integrable: L=0L=0 and U=1U=1 for every partition.

Fundamental theorem, part one. F(x)=axfF(x)=\int_a^x f is continuous whenever ff is integrable, and F(c)=f(c)F'(c)=f(c) wherever ff is continuous. Integration smooths.

Fundamental theorem, part two. abf=F(b)F(a)\int_a^b f = F(b)-F(a) for any antiderivative FF, proved by applying the MVT on each subinterval and telescoping.

Pointwise: NN may depend on xx. Uniform: one NN for all xx, equivalently fnf0\|f_n-f\|\to0.

Preserved by uniform convergenceNot preserved
Continuity of the limitDifferentiability
The value of the integralAnything about fnf_n'
The uniform Cauchy property-
  • xnx^n on [0,1][0,1]: continuous terms, discontinuous limit, fnf=1\|f_n-f\|=1 always. Uniform on [0,a][0,a] for a<1a<1.
  • sin(nx)n0\frac{\sin(nx)}{\sqrt n} \rightrightarrows 0 while fn=ncos(nx)f_n'=\sqrt n\cos(nx) diverges.
  • A spike of height nn and width 1/n1/n: pointwise limit 0, every integral 1.
  • Weierstrass M-test. un(x)Mn|u_n(x)|\le M_n with Mn<\sum M_n<\infty gives uniform convergence, and licenses term-by-term integration of power series.
TheoremStatement
Completeness axiomEvery nonempty set bounded above has a supremum
Archimedean propertyFor any real xx there is a natural n>xn > x
Monotone convergenceA bounded monotone sequence converges
Bolzano–WeierstrassEvery bounded sequence has a convergent subsequence
Cauchy criterionA sequence of reals converges iff it is Cauchy
Riemann rearrangementA conditionally convergent series can be rearranged to any sum
Heine–BorelCompact in R\mathbb{R} = closed and bounded
Extreme valueA continuous function on a compact interval attains its extremes
Intermediate valueA continuous function on [a,b][a,b] takes every intermediate value
Uniform continuity theoremContinuous on a compact set implies uniformly continuous
RolleEqual endpoint values give an interior critical point
Mean value theoremf(c)f'(c) equals the average rate for some interior cc
Taylorf=Pn+f(n+1)(ξ)(xa)n+1/(n+1)!f = P_n + f^{(n+1)}(\xi)(x-a)^{n+1}/(n+1)!
Riemann criterionIntegrable iff some partition makes ULU - L arbitrarily small
Fundamental theorem of calculusF=fF' = f where ff is continuous, and abf=F(b)F(a)\int_a^b f = F(b)-F(a)
Weierstrass M-testUniform bounds with a convergent sum give uniform convergence

They are worth memorizing as a set, because each one is the reason some hypothesis cannot be dropped.

ObjectShows
{xQ:x2<2}\{x\in\mathbb{Q}:x^2<2\}Q\mathbb{Q} is not complete
(1)n(-1)^nBounded need not imply convergent
n\sqrt{n}Consecutive terms close does not imply Cauchy
1/n\sum 1/nan0a_n\to0 does not imply convergence
(1)n+1/n\sum(-1)^{n+1}/nConvergent but not absolutely; rearrangeable
[0,1)[0,1)A set that is neither open nor closed
(1/n,1/n)\bigcap(-1/n,1/n)Infinite intersections of open sets need not be open
1/x1/x on (0,1](0,1]Non-compact domain breaks boundedness
sin(1/x)\sin(1/x) on (0,1](0,1]Continuous, not uniformly continuous
x2x^2 on R\mathbb{R}Continuous, not uniformly continuous on an unbounded set
x\sqrt{x} on [0,1][0,1]Uniformly continuous, not Lipschitz
x\lvert x\rvert at 0Continuous, not differentiable
e1/x2e^{-1/x^2}Smooth, not analytic
Dirichlet functionBounded, not Riemann integrable
xnx^n on [0,1][0,1]Pointwise limit of continuous functions can jump
sin(nx)/n\sin(nx)/\sqrt nUniform convergence says nothing about derivatives
Height-nn spike of width 1/n1/nLimit and integral do not always commute
  • Confusing sup with max. sup[0,1)=1\sup[0,1) = 1 and there is no maximum.
  • Letting NN depend on xx in a uniform statement, or on nn in a sequence statement. Quantifier order is the content.
  • Thinking an+1an0a_{n+1}-a_n\to0 makes a sequence Cauchy. n\sqrt n refutes it.
  • Using the nth-term test to prove convergence. It can only prove divergence.
  • Rearranging a conditionally convergent series.
  • Assuming “not open” means closed.
  • Applying EVT or IVT on an open or unbounded interval.
  • Forgetting that f(c)f(c) is irrelevant to limxcf(x)\lim_{x\to c}f(x).
  • Treating differentiable and continuous as interchangeable.
  • Reading Taylor’s theorem as an approximation. It is an equality; the remainder is exact.
  • Assuming a smooth function equals its Taylor series.
  • Concluding integrability from boundedness. The Dirichlet function is bounded and not integrable.
  • Interchanging a limit with an integral or a derivative without uniformity.
  • Expecting uniform convergence of fnf_n to say something about fnf_n'.
Which single property distinguishes ℝ from ℚ?
What is sup of the interval [0, 1)?
Which statement about aₙ → L is correct?
Which theorem guarantees a bounded sequence has a convergent subsequence?
Why does aₙ = √n fail to be Cauchy despite aₙ₊₁ − aₙ → 0?
For which p does Σ 1/nᵖ converge?
What is special about a conditionally convergent series?
Which set is neither open nor closed?
By Heine–Borel, which subsets of ℝ are compact?
Which hypothesis does the extreme value theorem require that the intermediate value theorem also requires?
How does uniform continuity differ from continuity?
Which function is uniformly continuous on [0, 1] but not Lipschitz there?
What is the relationship between differentiability and continuity?
Which calculus fact is a direct consequence of the mean value theorem?
In Taylor's theorem, what makes the statement an equality rather than an approximation?
What does e^(−1/x²), extended by 0 at the origin, demonstrate?
Which bounded function on [0, 1] is not Riemann integrable?
Which theorem is used to prove ∫ₐᵇ f = F(b) − F(a)?
Which property is preserved by uniform convergence but not by pointwise convergence?
What does the Weierstrass M-test establish?