Fixed Point Theorems
What You’ll Learn
Section titled “What You’ll Learn”In this lesson you’ll meet Brouwer’s fixed point theorem and its proof by the fundamental group, contrast it with the Banach fixed point theorem, and see the consequences from the hairy ball theorem to Nash equilibria.
The Concept
Section titled “The Concept”Brouwer’s theorem
Section titled “Brouwer’s theorem”Brouwer fixed point theorem. Every continuous map from a closed ball to itself has a fixed point, a with .
More generally the same holds for any compact convex subset of , and more generally still for any space homeomorphic to a ball.
The figure shows both low-dimensional cases. On the left, a continuous self-map of is plotted against the diagonal and the crossing is located by bisection on ; the figure also reports the endpoint differences and , which have opposite signs and are what force the crossing. On the right, a rotation of the disc moves every point except one, illustrating that the fixed point can be unique and that the theorem promises existence only.
The one-dimensional case
Section titled “The one-dimensional case”For the theorem is the intermediate value theorem in disguise.
Let be continuous and set . Then
because takes values in . A continuous with and must vanish somewhere, and there . ∎
Connectedness of the interval is doing the work. The higher-dimensional cases have no such elementary argument, and that is what makes the theorem a topological result rather than a calculus one.
The proof by fundamental group
Section titled “The proof by fundamental group”For , here is the standard argument, and it uses exactly the lemma from the last lesson.
Suppose had no fixed point. Then for every , so the direction from to is well defined. Follow the ray from through until it meets the boundary circle, and call that point .
This is continuous, since is and the construction never divides by zero. And for already on the boundary, the ray from through hits the circle at itself, so restricted to is the identity.
That makes a retraction of the disc onto its boundary, which we proved impossible: applying would factor the identity on through the trivial group.
∎
The whole theorem rests on . That is why the fundamental group had to come first.
Why the hypotheses matter
Section titled “Why the hypotheses matter”Each condition can be dropped to produce a counterexample.
Not convex, or the wrong shape. On the annulus , rotation by any nonzero angle has no fixed point. The annulus is compact but has a hole, and the hole is exactly what breaks the argument.
Not compact. On the open disc, the map pushes points toward a boundary point that is not in the space. On , has no fixed point.
Not continuous. Any swap of two points with a jump avoids fixed points trivially.
Not into itself. Needed by definition; a map out of the space cannot fix anything in it.
Banach’s theorem, for contrast
Section titled “Banach’s theorem, for contrast”Banach fixed point theorem. If is a complete metric space and satisfies
then has a unique fixed point, and iterating from any starting point converges to it.
The two theorems trade different things.
| Brouwer | Banach | |
|---|---|---|
| Needs | compact convex domain | complete space, contraction |
| Continuity required | continuous only | Lipschitz with |
| Conclusion | existence | existence and uniqueness |
| Constructive | no | yes - just iterate |
Brouwer is topological and non-constructive; Banach is metric and gives you an algorithm. Brouwer tells you a solution exists without any way to find it, which is why it is used for existence proofs in economics; Banach is what numerical methods actually run.
Consequences of Brouwer
Section titled “Consequences of Brouwer”The hairy ball theorem. No nowhere-zero continuous tangent field on , as in the Euler characteristic lesson. Equivalently there is always a point of zero horizontal wind on Earth.
Borsuk–Ulam. Any continuous takes the same value at some pair of antipodal points. On Earth: at any moment there are two antipodal points with the same temperature and pressure.
The ham sandwich theorem. Any measurable sets in can be simultaneously bisected by a single hyperplane. In three dimensions, one cut halves the bread, the ham, and the cheese at once.
Nash’s theorem. Every finite game has a mixed-strategy equilibrium, proved by applying Brouwer - or its generalization, Kakutani’s theorem - to the best-response map. This is the result that won Nash the Nobel Prize in Economics.
Perron–Frobenius. A positive matrix has a positive eigenvector, proved by applying Brouwer to the induced map on the simplex. This is the mathematics behind PageRank.
The stirring fact. Stir a cup of coffee continuously and gently, and at the moment you stop, some point of the liquid is where it started.
Worked Examples
Section titled “Worked Examples”Example 1: Prove the one-dimensional case.
Solution. Let be continuous and .
Since we have , and since we have .
By the intermediate value theorem, for some , so . ∎
Example 2: Show the annulus fails Brouwer.
Solution. On , rotation by is continuous and maps into itself.
It moves every point, since rotation fixes only the origin and .
Answer: no fixed point. ∎
is compact but not convex, and its is rather than trivial. The hole is what breaks the retraction argument.
Example 3: Show the open disc fails Brouwer.
Solution. On the open unit disc take
where . This maps the open disc into itself, since the midpoint of two points of modulus below 1 has modulus below 1.
A fixed point would satisfy , hence , which is on the boundary and not in the space.
Answer: no fixed point. ∎
Compactness is not optional.
Example 4: Apply Banach’s theorem.
Solution. Let on , which is complete. Then
so is a contraction with .
The unique fixed point solves , giving . Iterating from : ✓ ∎
Note the domain is not compact, so Brouwer does not apply. Banach needs completeness instead, and it delivers uniqueness and a method.
Example 5: Show Brouwer gives no uniqueness.
Solution. The identity map on is continuous and maps the disc to itself. Every point is fixed.
Meanwhile a rotation about the centre fixes exactly one point.
Answer: existence only; the count varies. ∎
Uniqueness requires the contraction condition, and the identity map is emphatically not a contraction.
Example 6: Use Borsuk–Ulam on Earth.
Solution. Define by sending each point to its (temperature, pressure) pair. Assuming these vary continuously, Borsuk–Ulam gives antipodal and with .
Answer: two antipodal points agree in both quantities. ∎
Two quantities, two dimensions. With three quantities the conclusion would fail, which is a good check that the dimension count in the statement is doing real work.
Example 7: Sketch the retraction argument.
Solution. Suppose has no fixed point. Since always, define as the point where the ray from through exits the disc.
is continuous, and for , so is a retraction .
Applying : the composite is the identity, so the induced maps compose to the identity on . But they factor through .
Answer: impossible, so a fixed point exists. ∎
Real-World Applications
Section titled “Real-World Applications”Economics. Existence of a Nash equilibrium and of Walrasian market equilibrium are both Brouwer-type results. The proofs are non-constructive, which is a substantive limitation: they say a price vector exists without telling you how a market would find it.
PageRank. Google’s original algorithm computes the Perron–Frobenius eigenvector of a stochastic matrix, whose existence is a Brouwer consequence, and computes it by iteration in the Banach style.
Numerical solvers. Newton’s method and fixed-point iteration converge by Banach’s theorem when the map is contractive, and the contraction constant gives the convergence rate directly.
Differential equations. The Picard–Lindelöf existence theorem is Banach’s theorem applied to an integral operator on a space of functions, so every ODE existence guarantee you have used is a fixed point argument.
Game AI and equilibrium computation. Finding equilibria in practice needs constructive methods precisely because Brouwer offers none, which is why algorithms like Lemke–Howson exist.
Meteorology and geodesy. The hairy ball and Borsuk–Ulam consequences are literally true statements about the atmosphere, and they are sometimes used as sanity checks on global model outputs.
Retrying will remove your ✅ checkmark until you pass again.